« on: December 10, 2007, 06:11:48 PM » Reply #15

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Cannons without low gravity = aliens win

« on: December 13, 2007, 08:49:27 PM » Reply #16

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

I always thought that the Bunker was fair and balanced in 1.1.

« on: December 14, 2007, 10:53:23 AM » Reply #17

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Yeah, bunker was good. Although the texture set works for the map, it doesn't really fit into trem :-/

Pretty fun map though. I overall agree. I think it would be even better in 1.2 when you can barricade off some of the entrances in that middle collection of rooms area.

« on: December 15, 2007, 01:16:09 AM » Reply #18

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

I'd love to see "paint" replace atcs

« on: December 15, 2007, 09:28:14 AM » Reply #19

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

I'd like to see a massive bit of rock replace ATCS. It'd be more fun

But in all seriousness, what is "paint"?

« on: December 15, 2007, 11:04:10 AM » Reply #20

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

How about sedna, sokolov, atcs3, and some of the other generally good-quality maps that have been made?

And are just looking for fun, or for 1.2 defaults?

« on: December 15, 2007, 12:45:17 PM » Reply #21

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

I started with "just for fun" but I suppose that the maps we most like tend to be good ones.

« on: December 15, 2007, 01:25:05 PM » Reply #22

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Quote from: Garoth on December 15, 2007, 09:28:14 AM

But in all seriousness, what is "paint"?

You don't want to know............................................

« on: December 15, 2007, 01:46:40 PM » Reply #23

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

You've got that right

« on: December 15, 2007, 01:51:43 PM » Reply #24

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Quote from: nand on December 15, 2007, 01:16:09 AM

I'd love to see "paint" replace atcs

Ah, now I know. I think it is time that we lose all respect for nand

I'm sure he was kidding though.

« on: December 15, 2007, 02:28:29 PM » Reply #25

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Quote from: Badger on December 15, 2007, 11:04:10 AM

atcs3

We had that before, but Norf told us to take it off. To be honest, one atcs is enough

« on: December 16, 2007, 01:26:27 AM » Reply #26

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

ATCS III suffers from its naming scheme.  It could have been called "Big Symetry" and I think people would have liked it and not even bothered equating it to ATCS.

« on: December 16, 2007, 01:03:42 PM » Reply #27

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Medic is right.

Just one note: it's called ATCS3 because the author was challenged to make an awesome ATCS-alike map.

« on: December 16, 2007, 01:57:11 PM » Reply #28

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Quote from: Garoth on December 16, 2007, 01:03:42 PM

Medic is right.

Just one note: it's called ATCS3 because the author was challenged to make an awesome ATCS-alike map.

Actually it's called that cause Jex (creator of atcs) asked Lava Croft to make ATCS3, while he worked on ATCS2.

Khalsa

« on: December 21, 2007, 09:22:42 PM » Reply #29

Re: Map Rotation for MG Dev

Quote from: Garoth link=topic=824. msg8752#msg8752 date=1197748303

Quote from: nand link=topic=824. msg8716#msg8716 date=1197702969

I'd love to see "paint" replace atcs

Ah, now I know.  I think it is time that we lose all respect for nand :)

* nand cries